Thanks for Putin that out there Security experts have poured scorn on plans by US president Donald Trump to work more
Thanks for Putin that out there
Security experts have poured scorn on plans by US president Donald Trump to work more closely with Russia on cybersecurity.
After the summit in Helsinki on Monday, both Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin deflected questions related to the US intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 US presidential election. The campaign was said to include hacking and leaking emails of senior Democrats alongside the promotion of “fake news” stories on social media designed to damage the candidacy of his Democrat challenger, Hillary Clinton.
Sir, you’ve been using Kaspersky Lab antivirus. Please come with us, sir
After two hours of face-to-face talks with Trump, Putin reiterated that Russia had never interfered in US affairs. In spite of US assessments to the contrary, Trump accepted the denial of the former KGB officer, adding there had been no reason for Russia to meddle in the vote.
Trump said Putin had been “extremely strong and powerful in his denial” of any election interference.
“President Putin says it’s not Russia. I don’t see any reason why it should be,” Trump said during a press conference after the summit, which followed days after 12 Russian military intelligence agents were indicted over accusations of hacking the presidential campaign of Clinton.
President Putin offered to allow US investigators to visit Russia to question the officers in exchange for access to individuals in the US that Russia suspects of criminal activity.
Sean Sullivan, a security advisor at F-Secure, said Russia had abused such co-operation in the past so there’s little prospect of it being reinstated now.
FBI agents take aim at VPNFilter botnet, point finger at Russia, yell ‘national security threat’
“Putin is bringing up a 1999 treaty on an agreement on criminal cases,” Sullivan told El Reg, “suggesting that a working arrangement already exists and that the US is able to submit its concerns to Russia. But that sort of stuff halted years ago after the FBI found that the Russians were recruiting rather than arresting/investigating the criminal leads forwarded to the FSB.”
Trump went on to talk about a joint US/Russia working group on cybersecurity. Recorded Future’s Priscilla Moriuchi, who led the National Security Agency’s East Asia and Pacific cyber threats office prior to joining the threat intel firm, described the scheme as a threat in itself.
“Without a doubt there are many issues within the cyber context that the US and Russia could work together on to improve,” she said. “These include cyber operations in wartime, attacks on critical infrastructure, and cyber-enabled intellectual property theft among others.
“However, operating a joint working group on cybersecurity in order to examine the digital and forensic evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 US election would be both counterproductive and dangerous. Enabling Russia to gain an even greater understanding of US cyber defences and analytic capabilities would put AmericanÂ citizens and businesses at even greater risk of attack.”
Moriuchi concluded: “Putin does not seek transparency in cyber operations with the United States, he seeks an advantage in what he views as a zero-sum power struggle with the West. A joint cyber operations working group would grant him that advantage.”
F-Secure’s Sullivan agreed that a joint cyber working group with Russia would be like “letting the fox into the hen house”.
Sullivan, a graduate of political science who attended the Helsinki summit, added: “In an ideal world, Trump and Putin would discuss the possibility of working together to fight cybercrime and hackers. There was at one time a history of co-operation between the two countries in this respect. However, the current political climate means the chances of this happening are slim.” Â®